Elected Public Office and Private Benefit: Firm-level Returns from Businesspeople Becoming Politicians in Russia
نویسنده
چکیده
Do firms benefit from political connections? If so, what are the underlying mechanisms behind the positive relationship? Using an original dataset of close to 3,000 politically connected firms in Russia, I examine the widespread but understudied strategy of businesspeople directly running for elected office. The paper employs a regression discontinuity design to identify the causal effect of gaining political ties, comparing outcomes of firms that are directed by candidates who either won or lost close elections to subnational legislatures. I first find that a connection to a winning politician can increase revenue by roughly 60% and profit margins by 15% over their time in office. I then test between different mechanisms potentially explaining the results, finding that connected firms improve their performance by gaining access to bureaucrats and reducing information costs, and not by signaling legitimacy to financiers. Finally, winning a parliamentary seat is more valuable for firms where democratization is greater, but less valuable when firms face acute sector-level competition. This finding suggests that the intensity of economic rivalry, rather than the quality of political institutions, best explains the decision to send a director into public office. ∗Department of Political Science, Columbia University and International Center for the Study of Institutions and Development (ICSID), Moscow, Russia. [email protected]. I thank Quintin Beazer, Michael Best, Noah Buckley-Farlee, Bo Cowgill, Tim Frye, Jonas Hjort, Phil Keefer, Yegor Lazarev, Eddy Malesky, Yotam Margalit, Israel Marques, Will Pyle, John Reuter, Camille-Strauss Kahn, and Johannes Urpelainen for their useful comments. This material was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) and supported within the framework of a subsidy granted to the HSE by the Government of the Russian Federation for the implementation of the Global Competitiveness Program. It also is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-11-44155. All errors are my own.
منابع مشابه
Private Sector Policymaking
Candidates often tout their private sector experience when running for public office. Success in the business world, they argue, uniquely qualifies them for government work. In this paper, I test whether businessperson politicians govern differently from other types of leaders using data on over 25,000 Russian mayors and regional legislators. Analyzing both a close election regression discontin...
متن کاملIs It Worth It ? On the Returns to Holding Political Office ∗ JOB MARKET PAPER
Despite the key role played by political payoffs in theory, very little is known empirically about the types of payoffs that motivate politicians. The purpose of this paper is to bring some light into this. I estimate causal effects of being elected in a local election on monetary returns. The claim for causality, I argue, can be made thanks to a research design where the income of some candida...
متن کاملPolitical Incentives to Privatize
The scope of the public sector (i.e. what activities are undertaken by public rather than private entities) is a decision made by politicians. While there are economic costs and benefits to privatization, there is also a political benefit to incumbents: By privatizing today, politicians transfer future revenues (when they might not be in office) to the present. This political benefit leads to o...
متن کاملBad Politicians
We present a simple theory of the quality (competence and honesty) of elected officials. Our theory offers three main insights. Low-quality citizens have a ‘comparative advantage’ in pursuing elective office, because their market wages are lower than those of high-quality citizens (competence), and/or because they reap higher returns from holding office (honesty). Hence, voters may find themsel...
متن کاملPolitical Selection and the Quality of Government: Evidence from South India∗
This paper uses household data from India to examine the consequences of a unique experiment in democratization which saw more than two million people elected to run village governments. We examine who is elected to village public office and how they disburse benefits once they are there. We have three key findings. First, the political class is selected on the basis of political connections an...
متن کامل